System for digital professional development of university teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.6Keywords:
certification training, system for digital professional development, digital competence, e-learningAbstract
The article highlights the issues of developing a system for digital competence of the teacher. The paper describes the research that resulted in the development and implementation of the system for digital professional development for university teachers at the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. The principle of system adaptation is realized in two directions: to time possibilities of testing and minicourse passing; to needs of teachers according to professional direction and disciplines taught. A model of organisation of this system based on self-assessment, self-education and micro-teaching principles has been developed. The main structural elements of the system are diagnostic test and sets of minicourses.
The approaches to the formation of the diagnostic test, including ensuring its integration, variability and validity, as well as the principle of its use in order to establish the level of digital competence of teachers in accordance with the developed corporate standard of digital competence were applied in detail. Using the example of the compulsory level of digital competence Analyst-Researcher (A) the use of mini-course sets for Integrator (B1), Expert (B2), Leader (C1) and Innovator (C2) levels are described. The system allows teachers to build their own professional development trajectory as a digital footprint reflected in a personal study, and the use of embedded business intelligence tools provides a visualised holistic picture of digital professional performance. The place of the system and its further development for professional development in the digital twin of the educational institution is highlighted.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.E., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C., eds, 2001. A Taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Available from: https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl%20-%20A%20taxonomy%20for%20learning%20teaching%20and%20assessing.pdf.
Bakhmat, L., Babakina, O. and Belmaz, Y., 2021. Assessing online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of lecturers in Ukraine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), p.012050. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012050
Bloom, B.S., ed., 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans. Available from: https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Bloom%20et%20al%20-Taxonomy%20of%20Educational%20Objectives.pdf.
Bondarchuk, O.I., Balakhtar, V.V., Ushenko, Y.O., Gorova, O.O., Osovska, I.M., Pinchuk, N.I., Yakubovska, N.O., Balakhtar, K.S. and Moskalov, M.V., 2022. The psychological safety of the educational environment of Ukrainian higher education institutions in a pandemic: empirical data of a comparative analysis of participants’ assessments studying online. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 1: AET. INSTICC, SciTePress, pp.14–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010920100003364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010920100003364
Buinytska, O., Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., Terletska, T. and Nastas, D., 2020. Modernization of electronic learning system of the university to the needs of the participants of the educational process. Open educational e-environment of modern university, (9), pp.1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2020.9.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2020.9.1
Buinytska, O. and Vasylenko, S., 2018. Using e-courses to enhance the future teachers‘ digital competence. Open educational e-environment of modern university, (SPECIAL EDITION), pp.44–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s5
Bulakh, I. and Mruha, M., 2006. We create a quality test. Kyiv: Testing Center at the Ministry of health of Ukraine.
Burov, O.Y., Kiv, A.E., Semerikov, S.O., Striuk, A.M., Striuk, M.I., Kolgatina, L.S. and Oliinyk, I.V., 2020. AREdu 2020 - How augmented reality helps during the coronavirus pandemic. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2731, pp.1–46. Available from: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2731/paper00.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4115
Data Visualization | Microsoft Power BI, 2021. Available from: https://powerbi.microsoft.com/.
Falfushynska, H.I., Buyak, B.B., Tereshchuk, H.V., Torbin, G.M. and Kasianchuk, M.M., 2020. Strengthening of e-learning at the leading Ukrainian pedagogical universities in the time of COVID-19 pandemic. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2879, pp.261–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4442
Hodovaniuk, T.L., Makhometa, T.M., Tiahai, I.M., Medvedieva, M.O., Pryshchepa, S.M. and Voznyak, A.V., 2022. Educational trainings as one of the effective forms of digital competence development of secondary school teachers. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 2: AET. INSTICC, SciTePress, pp.372–381. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010931900003364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010931900003364
Kluzer, S. and Pujol Priego, L., 2018. DigComp into action, get inspired make it happen: A user guide to the European Digital Competence framework. (JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 29115 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2760/112945.
Kuzminska, O., Mazorchuk, M., Morze, N., Pavlenko, V. and Prokhorov, A., 2019. Study of Digital Competence of the Students and Teachers in Ukraine. Communications in computer and information science, 1007, pp.148–169. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13929-2_8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13929-2_8
Machin, S. and Vignoles, A., 2018. What’s the good of education?: The economics of education in the UK. Princeton University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv301fj7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv301fj7
Meyers, E.M., Erickson, I. and Small, R.V., 2013. Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, media and technology, 38(4), pp.355–367. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Mintii, I.S., Shokaliuk, S.V., Vakaliuk, T.A., Mintii, M.M. and Soloviev, V.N., 2019. Import test questions into Moodle LMS. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2433, pp.529–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3271
Moiseienko, M.V., Moiseienko, N.V. and Kiv, A.E., 2020. Didactic conditions for the formation of digital competence of students of pedagogical universities. Educational dimension, 54(2), p.165–178. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v54i2.3866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v54i2.3866
Morze, N. and Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., 2014. Electronic portfolio as a tool for measuring the performance of a teacher of modern universities. Information sciences and technology in education, (53), pp.36–41.
Morze, N. and Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., 2016. Educator’s e-portfolio in the modern university. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1614, pp.231–240.
Morze, N.V. and Buinytska, O.P., 2017. Raising information and communication technologies competence of scientific and pedagogical employees - a key requirement of the quality of educational process. Information technologies and learning tools, 59(3), p.189–200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1667
OECD, 2010. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Lessons from PISA for the United States. OECD Publishing. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en
Ottestad, G., Kelentrić, M. and Guðmundsdóttir, G.B., 2014. Professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 9(04), pp.243–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-04-02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-02
Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D.C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J. and Mondelli, V., 2021. 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | Teaching and Learning Edition. Boulder: EDUCAUSE. Available from: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2021/4/2021-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition.
Regulations on advanced training of scientific and pedagogical employees of the university, 2015. Available from: https://kubg.edu.ua/phocadownload/Nauka/stajuvannia/polozhennya_pidvyschennya2015.pdf.
Seel, N.M. and Zierer, K., 2019. Bibliometric synthesis of educational productivity research: Benchmarking the visibility of German educational research. Research in comparative and international education, 14(2), pp.294–317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919846189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919846189
Soroko, N.V., 2020. Methodology for teachers’ digital competence developing through the use of the STEAM-oriented learning environment. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2732, pp.1260–1271.
Sultanova, L.Y., Tsiuniak, O.P., Milto, L.O., Zheludenko, M.O., Lyktei, L.M., Petrenko, L.M. and Uchitel, A.D., 2020. The potential of Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2879, pp.346–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4445
Teachers of higher education institutions, 2021. Available from: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/zatverdzheno-standart-na-grupu-profesij-vikladachi-zakladiv-vishoyi-osviti.
Thomas, L., ed., 2013. What is Canadian about Teacher Education in Canada? Multiple Perspectives on Canadian Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century. Canadian Association of Teacher Education. Available from: https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/113301?show=full.
Tomas, C. and Kelo, M., 2020. ESG 2015–2018 ENQA Agency Reports: Thematic Analysis. (ENQA occasional paper, 28). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
Trubavina, I., Dotsenko, S., Naboka, O., Chaikovskyi, M. and Meshko, H., 2021. Developing digital competence of teachers of humanitarian disciplines in the conditions of COVID-19 quarantine measures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), p.012052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012052
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2014. Law of Ukraine “On Higher Education”. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18.
Wei, R., Darling-Hammond, L. and Adamson, F., 2010. Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. Dallas: National Staff Development Council. Available from: https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-development-united-states-trends-and-challenges.pdf.
Yarbro, J., McKnight, K., Elliott, S., Kurz, A. and Wardlow, L., 2016. Digital instructional strategies and their role in classroom learning. Journal of research on technology in education, 48(4), pp.274–289. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1212632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1212632
Yaroshenko, O.G., Samborska, O.D. and Kiv, A.E., 2022. Experimental verification of efficiency of the formation of information and digital competence of bachelors of primary education based on an integrated approach. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 1: AET. INSTICC, SciTePress, pp.644–652. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010926800003364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010926800003364
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nataliia V. Morze, Oksana P. Buinytska, Liliia O. Varchenko-Trotsenko, Svitlana V. Vasylenko, Dariya L. Nastas, Anastasiia V. Tiutiunnyk, Svitlana H. Lytvynova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.