The institute of property and trust in national economy: prioritization, impulse of development and crystalization of facilities

Краус, Катерина Миколаївна and Краус, Наталія Миколаївна (2020) The institute of property and trust in national economy: prioritization, impulse of development and crystalization of facilities Інфраструктура ринку (39). pp. 9-14. ISSN 2519-2868

[thumbnail of Kraus_Instytut vlasnosti_39_2020.pdf]
Preview
Text
Kraus_Instytut vlasnosti_39_2020.pdf

Download (290kB) | Preview

Abstract

The article examines the institute of ownership of national economy through the prism of regulating institutions of the property market, the institute of restrictions, sanctions, coercion, and the institutions of prioritization of property development. An attempt has been made to represent the correlation between formal and informal property institutions. Author’s vision of the impulses for the development of a new quality of the institute of trust, the problems that have a place in the building of long-term relationships on trust, the characteristic features and the content are presented. Authors are of the opinion that the key reasons for the loss of trust today include: unethical behavior of employees (fraud, bribery, corruption), which occurs during the analysis of risks of business entity; unreliability of information protection of data or assets received from consumers. Rationale for trust-based property relations is grounded in research. It is established that measures of regulation of property relations consist of economic, moral, ethical, legal and contractual measures. The measures of regulation of property relations, which cannot but be based on no less powerful institute – the institute of trust in the system of institutional registration, are revealed. Trust has been shown to apply not only to the corporate brand, the products / services provided, or the people who represent the entity. Trust takes place in data and analytics. The rating of the property rights and trust institutions of the governmental institutions, the quality of legal institutes in individual countries in 2011 and 2018 are presented. Singapore and Sweden occupied the leading position in 2011 and 2018 years on the three indicators (quality of legal institutions, intellectual property rights and public domain to government institutions) of the rating of property rights and trust in governmental institutions. As for Ukraine, in terms of quality of legal institutions in 2011 and 2018 it was in the last positions in this rating. In terms of intellectual property rights, in the years under review, Ukraine had the worst ranking among the countries in the rating list, and by public confidence in governmental institutions, Ukraine ranked last in 2018 slightly in 2018 and ranked fourth from the end.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: institute of trust; institute of property; national economy; prioritization of property development; impulses of development of new quality of institute of trust
Subjects: Статті у наукометричних базах > Index Copernicus
Divisions: Факультети > Факультет інформаційних технологій та управління > Кафедра управління
Depositing User: Катерина Миколаївна Краус
Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2020 08:09
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2020 08:09
URI: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/31083

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item