Pragmatics of deception in the un security council: hierarchy of pragmatic attitudes

Гольцева, Марія Ігорівна (2021) Pragmatics of deception in the un security council: hierarchy of pragmatic attitudes Вчені записки ТНУ імені В. І. Вернадського. Серія: Філологія. Журналістика, 32(71) (2 Ч.1). с. 113-120. ISSN 2710-4656

[thumbnail of M_Holtseva_VZ_TNU_2_1_2021_FRGF.pdf] Текст
M_Holtseva_VZ_TNU_2_1_2021_FRGF.pdf

Download (450kB)
Офіційне посилання: https://philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/archive?id=...

Анотація

The article focuses on deceptive utterances in diplomatic discourse. As diplomats represent their countries on the world stage, sometimes they may present the information in the most favorable light for them. In other words, they deceive. The purpose of deception is to mislead, conceal a fact, to persuade an opponent. Special attention is paid to verbalization of deception and the ways of implementing it through the signs of deception. This paper provides a detailed account of the hierarchy of pragmatic attitudes of deception in the communicative situation of the UN Security Council meetings. Pragmatics deals not only with the background information, but also with the conditions of a speaker to use a proper sign. The structure of a language sign is interpreted via the formal 7-level systemic model. Together with the structure of deception and its verbal realization during the diplomatic meetings, starting from the reason of the meeting, and ending with the final result. Thus, a three-dimensional sign space has been used, which is realized at semantic, syntactic and pragmatic levels. As a result, we have illustrated how exactly these levels are realized in the diplomatic discourse. We have concentrated our attention on a specific litigation between the representatives of America and Russia. This paper holds that the information distortion is not a personal issue, being involved in the military and business connections between different countries, thus appearing to a collective issue. As a result of these connections, three groups of interests are determined: 1) CSTO and SCO; 2) NATO and EU; 3) the League of Arab States. The first two groups of alliances are the main opponents who tend to deceive in most cases. The last group is usually a victim side, where the former two argue and deceive blaming each other for being economical with the truth

Тип елементу : Стаття
Ключові слова: speech act; linguistic expression of deception; pragmatic attitudes; sign; pragmatics
Типологія: Це архівна тематика Київського університету імені Бориса Грінченка > Статті у наукометричних базах > Index Copernicus
Це архівна тематика Київського університету імені Бориса Грінченка > Статті у журналах > Фахові (входять до переліку фахових, затверджений МОН)
Підрозділи: Це архівні підрозділи Київського університету імені Бориса Грінченка > Факультет романо-германської філології > Кафедра германської філології
Користувач, що депонує: Марія Ігорівна Гольцева
Дата внесення: 08 Січ 2024 11:34
Останні зміни: 08 Січ 2024 11:34
URI: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/41594

Actions (login required)

Перегляд елементу Перегляд елементу