The Advantages and Risks of AI in Sustainable SocietalDevelopment: Perspectives of Future Psychologists

Столярчук, Олеся Анатоліївна та Клішевич, Наталія Анатоліївна та Павлюк, Роман Олександрович та Lin, Tian та Binkivska, Kristina та Сергєєнкова, Оксана Павлівна та Strunhar, Аrtur та Divchuk, Tetiana (2025) The Advantages and Risks of AI in Sustainable SocietalDevelopment: Perspectives of Future Psychologists European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14 (2). с. 562-574. ISSN 2239-5938

Текст Stoliarchuk_Klishevych_Pavliuk_Serhieienkova_EJSD_FPSRSO_2025.pdf - Опублікована версія Download (297kB)

Анотація

In the context of widespread psychological trauma among Ukrainian citizens, the education of futurepsychologists requires careful development of their professional competence and responsibility.Consequently, the nature and outcomes of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the professionaleducation of future psychologists pose a significant challenge for the national educational system dueto the risks of academic integrity violations.A study involving 184 first- to fourth-year students highlighted the controversial role of AI in theprofessional education of future psychologists. Additionally, this study examines the role of AI ininventive activities, grounded in the theory and practice of inventive problem solving (TRIZ),exploring how AI fosters creative problem-solving and supports the development of innovativeapproaches in psychological practice.It was found that AI implementation in psychology students’ professional education is currentlyspontaneous and unregulated. The majority of surveyed students have repeatedly used AI forindependent and qualification-related work, as well as for test assessments, without recognizing theiractions as violations of academic integrity. Future psychologists identify several benefits of AI in theirstudies, including idea generation, information supplementation, systematization and structuring, andthe rapid collection of relevant and useful data. However, common drawbacks include unreliable,misleading, or politically biased information, the absence of source citations, inaccurate data orprocedural algorithms, and the occurrence of informational or visual hallucinations.The majority of respondents firmly believe that AI cannot fully replace psychologists, viewing it solelyas an auxiliary tool. A positive finding is the students’ multifaceted understanding of AI’s applicationsin professional psychological practice

Тип елементу :	Стаття
Додаткова інформація:	Stoliarchuk, O., Klishevych, N., Pavliuk, R., Tian, L., Binkivska, K., Serhieienkova, O., Strunhar А., & Divchuk, T. (2025). The Advantages and Risks of AI in Sustainable Societal Development: Perspectives of Future Psychologists. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 562-574. Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n2p562
Ключові слова:	professional education; future psychologists; sustainable societal development; artificialintelligence (AI); academic integrity; inventive activities
Типологія:	Статті у періодичних виданнях > Інші (не входять ні до фахових, ні до баз даних)
Підрозділи:	Факультет психології, соціальної роботи та спеціальної освіти > Кафедра психології особистості та соціальних практик
Користувач, що депонує:	Роман Олександрович Павлюк
Дата внесення:	02 Черв 2025 12:07
Останні зміни:	02 Черв 2025 12:07
URI:	https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/52008

Actions (login required)

Перегляд елементу