Evaluating Citations and Retractions of 71 Write a Scientific Paper Guidelines

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. and Nazarovets, S. (2026) Evaluating Citations and Retractions of 71 Write a Scientific Paper Guidelines Internet Reference Services Quarterly. ISSN 1087-5301

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A citation analysis was conducted on 71 Write a Scientific Paper (WASP) best practice guidelines (BPGs) published in Elsevier’s Early Human Development (EHD) during 2018–2019, exclusively by University of Malta researchers. By 18 January 2026, the 71 WASP BPGs had accumulated a total of 555 citations, with Victor Grech and Sarah Cuschieri gaining a total of 336 and 165 citations, respectively. An editorial expression of concern, published in 2021, encompasses 48 of the WASP BPGs, and of the 71 BPGs, 30 (42%) have been retracted. Amassing independent BPGs in a single journal with poor corrective measures carries risks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: academic publishing; ethical guidelines; peer-reviewed journals; retractions; stringency
Subjects: Статті у базах даних > Scopus > У виданнях Q1 Scopus
Divisions: Бібліотека
Depositing User: Сергій Андрійович Назаровець
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2026 15:07
Last Modified: 19 Feb 2026 15:07
URI: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/56455

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item